Let me just say that I generally have a good opinion of police offices, but this guy sickens me.
It’s clear from the video that his use of force was unnecessary, and didn’t help the problem besides. The officer violates some basic arresting etiquette, such as telling the driver what he was charged with, and that he intended to arrest him. I heard that, many times, those with criminal-like pathologies join the police force, watching this video makes me believe it.
The use of force was completely unjustified; he calls the driver over, and then tasers him; it was clear that it wasn’t necessary, as the driver was argumentative but generally cooperating.
As Nicholas Provenzo at the Center for the Advancement of Capitalism said:
“The police officer was not clear about his intention to place the driver under arrest. The driver, albeit confused and mildly agitated, thought he was negotiating his citation throughout the encounter. The police officer did not refute this mistaken, yet not dishonest premise. The police officer did not indicate the offense the driver was charged with, or that any further discussion or debate should be saved for a judge. Lastly, the police officer did not in any way indicate that the driver's signing of the citation was not an admission of guilt, but instead allowed the officer to release the driver without arresting him.”
He continues:
“Knowledge of this incentive would likely have led to marked change in the driver's reaction. Instead, the police officer used his weapon to subdue a man who presented no immediate physical threat to him. I say his actions fit the definition of unreasonable to the letter.”
He also makes a good point on the practical use of force by officers:
“Furthermore, as part of the practical aspect of policing, the officer's conduct escalated the situation rather then subdued it. If I were his superior, I'd fire him for recklessness and unprofessional conduct.”
I agree with Mr. Provenzo. Beyond being unreasonable, the officer showed absolutely no tact in dealing with the situation; that alone disqualifies him to wear the badge.
I hope in the near future, this officer finds himself without one, as well as any officer like him.
For contrast, here is an officer that handles himself professionally in a much more stressful situation:
Saturday, December 8, 2007
Thursday, December 6, 2007
The Real Meaning of Christmas
Here is a writer who attempts to trace back the “real” meaning of the holiday.
Grocery Reform
Richard Ralston makes a case for National Grocery Reform.
He says:
“One of the great scandals of our age is the fact that America spends more on food than any other nation. Many political leaders are now calling for urgent reform to bring spending on food under control. Even worse, while the result of this uncontrolled spending includes the fact that many Americans are overweight, some Americans do not have enough to eat.”
What he proposes is a drastic change to the America’s Food System:
“To achieve savings by eliminating the profits of food manufacturers, the U.S. Department of Agriculture will assume ownership of all of these firms, purchase all crops from farmers (until such time as agriculture can be reorganized into government operations) and manufacture an appropriate amount of food.”
Of course, this food utopia can’t be built without a little sacrifice, he continues:
“In spite of the efficiencies and cost reductions that government management will achieve, there is some concern that food might not be affordable for everyone. And food is surely a "right," as it is necessary for human survival. Therefore all groceries made available in government commissaries will be free of charge. This will be financed by an increase of 15 percent in income taxes, except for those making over $80,000 a year, whose taxes will be increased by 75 percent. Because the supply of food is not unlimited, a fixed amount of ration coupons will be distributed to insure that each consumer can obtain an equal amount of food.”
These brilliant ideas have implications elsewhere, as Ralston admits in his own article. I’ll let him have the last word:
“Rumor has it that the clincher for those proposing socialized grocery plans was stated recently by one of the presidential candidates: "The ideal thing about these proposals is that if we can somehow get this to work for groceries, we can apply it to health care."
He says:
“One of the great scandals of our age is the fact that America spends more on food than any other nation. Many political leaders are now calling for urgent reform to bring spending on food under control. Even worse, while the result of this uncontrolled spending includes the fact that many Americans are overweight, some Americans do not have enough to eat.”
What he proposes is a drastic change to the America’s Food System:
“To achieve savings by eliminating the profits of food manufacturers, the U.S. Department of Agriculture will assume ownership of all of these firms, purchase all crops from farmers (until such time as agriculture can be reorganized into government operations) and manufacture an appropriate amount of food.”
Of course, this food utopia can’t be built without a little sacrifice, he continues:
“In spite of the efficiencies and cost reductions that government management will achieve, there is some concern that food might not be affordable for everyone. And food is surely a "right," as it is necessary for human survival. Therefore all groceries made available in government commissaries will be free of charge. This will be financed by an increase of 15 percent in income taxes, except for those making over $80,000 a year, whose taxes will be increased by 75 percent. Because the supply of food is not unlimited, a fixed amount of ration coupons will be distributed to insure that each consumer can obtain an equal amount of food.”
Ralston makes some good points; it certainly makes as much sense as anything else being said today.
These brilliant ideas have implications elsewhere, as Ralston admits in his own article. I’ll let him have the last word:
“Rumor has it that the clincher for those proposing socialized grocery plans was stated recently by one of the presidential candidates: "The ideal thing about these proposals is that if we can somehow get this to work for groceries, we can apply it to health care."
Wednesday, December 5, 2007
The World’s First Stand-Up Economist
Who said that economists have no sense of humor?
You can see this guys other videos at his website Here.
You can see this guys other videos at his website Here.
Monday, December 3, 2007
What’s caused by Global Warming? Just about everything.
Check out This List to find out more.
Each item on the list is a link to an actual site or article that makes the claim.
I wish Global Warming were more well-known when I was in high school, I could blame my failed history tests on it.
Each item on the list is a link to an actual site or article that makes the claim.
I wish Global Warming were more well-known when I was in high school, I could blame my failed history tests on it.
Saturday, December 1, 2007
Creation Museum
Visit This Site to see some pictures of the Creationist Museum.
Did you know that there is absolutely no evidence to suggest that life existed more the six-thousand-years-ago?
Oh, how facts and the scientific method deceive us all!
Did you know that there is absolutely no evidence to suggest that life existed more the six-thousand-years-ago?
Oh, how facts and the scientific method deceive us all!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)